The Great Mental Models of Vision-Language Models 12 lectures

A lecture series  ·  Revised July 2026

The Great Mental Models of Seeing and Reading

A language model has no eyes. Every vision-language architecture is a different answer to the same question: how do you hand a model that only understands token sequences a picture, without either throwing away what makes it a language model or pretending vision is just another vocabulary?

Scroll slowly ↓

Every VLM makes the same three decisions: how to turn pixels into something token-shaped, how much of the language model to keep frozen while that happens, and whether vision and language ever really share one stream or only ever talk through an adapter.
The field moved from bolting vision onto a frozen LLM (adapters, cross-attention, learned queries) toward fusing both modalities from the first token — and, most recently, toward models that generate images as fluently as they describe them. Each volume is a harder answer to the same three decisions.
I

The tokenizing problem

A language model consumes a sequence of discrete tokens. A photograph is neither discrete nor a sequence until something makes it one.

II

The bridging problem

Retraining a frozen, expensive LLM from scratch to understand pixels is wasteful. Every adapter architecture is a way to avoid it.

III

The generating problem

Understanding an image and producing one are different skills. Recent models try to fold both into a single objective.